Difference and parameter analysis of LST inversion based on Landsat data
Author:
Affiliation:

1.School of Computer Science and Communication Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China;2.College of Civil Engineering, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China;3.School of Economics and Management, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou 350108, China

Clc Number:

TP79

Fund Project:

Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (42301385)

  • Article
  • |
  • Figures
  • |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference
  • |
  • Related
  • |
  • Cited by
  • |
  • Materials
  • |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    The correct use of the product is possible only when the land surface temperature (LST) data is calculated by an accurate and reliable inversion algorithm. In this paper, we compare the inversion results of five commonly used LST inversion algorithms based on Landsat-8, Landsat-9 data, and weather station data. The inversion results and parameter sensitivity analysis of different algorithms are tested. The results show that the inversion results of the Radiative Transfer Equation (RTE) and Single Channel (SC) algorithms calculated based on land surface emissivity (LSE) are in good agreement with the ground measured. The inversion results of the SC algorithm based on the atmospheric water vapor inversion and the Split Window (SW) algorithm based on the atmospheric water vapor inversion are higher than the measured temperature. The inversion accuracy of the Mono Window (MW) algorithm based on average temperature parameters is not ideal. In addition, the consistency of the inversion temperature of the two data on different ground objects is compared. Our study can provide a reference for land surface temperature inversion based on Landsat-9 data.

    Reference
    Related
    Cited by
Get Citation

WAN Ji-Kang, SHEN Zhe-Hui, LI Shan. Difference and parameter analysis of LST inversion based on Landsat data[J]. Journal of Infrared and Millimeter Waves,2024,43(2):225~233

Copy
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:
  • PDF:
  • HTML:
  • Cited by:
History
  • Received:June 28,2023
  • Revised:February 29,2024
  • Adopted:August 21,2023
  • Online: February 22,2024
  • Published: